Columbia, South Carolina September 21,1994

Hearings are Rehearsal for Trials to Come

By MONTE PAULSEN
Staff Writer

Charlotte - The public hearing into the crash of USAir Flight 1016 is similar to a trial - except the gallery sits behind long tables spread before the witness, while the lawyers are held at the back of the room.

The National Transportation Safety Board, the federal agency conducting the hearing, will never assess blame for the July 2 crash that killed 37 of the 57 people aboard. It won't even determine what caused the crash until it issues its final report some time next year.

But most of the people in the four-day hearing will face one another again in various courtrooms. There, blame will be decided and millions of dollars in damages assessed.

"We don't yet know exactly who is at fault," attorney Larry Richter Jr. said. "But we intend to show that somebody is at fault."

Richter. a state senator from Mount Pleasant, is one of dozens of lawyers attending the hearings.

The 25 witnesses scheduled to testify sit to the left of a platform where the four-man board sits. At the foot of the platform, representatives of each of the 11 "interested parties" sit at tables spread out like a flotilla crossing the ballroom's aqua carpet.

The official parties include: USAir, the Airline Pilots Association, the Association of Flight Attendants. Transportation Workers Union, The International Brotherhood of Machinists, Federal Aviation Administration; National Air Traffic Controllers Association, National Weather Service, Douglas Aircraft, engine manufacturer Pratt & Whitney and wind-shear warning system manufacturer Honeywell.

Each wants to put the best foot forward to minimize its future exposure in the courtroom.

The Airline Pilots Association, for example, does not want Flight 1016's pilots blamed for the crash. ALPA. a union and self-professed "air- line- safely watchdog," brought a half-dozen staffers and another dozen volunteer pilots to work the halls and help put the right spin on stories filed by the dozens of reporters covering the hearing.

ALPA held its first press briefing two hours before the hearing even began, and stocked an upstairs suite with food and drink to entice hungry reporters.

ALPA wants to get this message out: If only The Air Traffic Controllers had provided Capt. Michael Greenlee with complete weather Information, Flight 101 never would have flown into a thunderstorm.

But the National Weather Service, the National Air Traffic Controllers Association and the Federal Aviation Administration, which is responsible for air traffic control, want a different story to emerge.

They suggest that it was not their failure to inform Greanlee, but the captain's failure to follow procedure that put Flight 1016 at risk.

When Greenlee took the witness stand, an FAA representative confronted him with NTSB data refuting his claim to have aborted the landing while 450 feet above the runway. The flight data recorder showed he was only 200 feet up.

And the FAA pried at Greenlee's decision to turn right instead of climbing straight out after aborting the landing. That decision may have taken Flight 1016 directly into a microburst.

As the official parties bicker, the dozens of lawyers crowded in the back of the room and circling in the hotel halls feed on every detail. To the attorneys and their clients, It does not matter who's at fault - as long as someone is. Richter and Columbia attorney Jack Swirling represent the families of crash victim Charles Jeter and his two young daughters.

"We represent a 2-year-old and a 6-year-old. Both of those girls are dead now. They don't care who is at fault." Richter said.

Swerling said the NTSB hearing is a "big benefit" to preparing their case.

Swerling said the opportunely to meet and informally compare notes with so many other attorneys working on crash cases was helpful. But he was also scornful of the way some out-of- state attorneys recruited clients after the crash. Thirty-four of the 37 people killed were from South Carolina.

Two of the nation's most successful lawyers specializing in air disasters. Robert Baizer and David Rapoport of Chicago, also attended the hearing. They have handled or are currently handling 26 cases from four major airline disasters.

Baizer and Rapoport represent perhaps the largest group of Flight 1016 plaintiffs: survivor Jason Sturkie as well as the estates of victims Christopher Bowles, Stephen Mattox, Freddie Sue Sturkie and Mildred Louise Welch. The lawyers said they are close to filing additional cases.

It won't be the first lime Baizer and Rapoport go against USAir. They recently won an $8.1 million jury settlement for the Ohio widow of a victim In USAir'a 1992 crash at New York's La- Guardia airport.

"Our clients are victims of a disaster that should never have occurred," Rapoport said.

"It's up to a jury to decide who's at fault," he added. "In order to recover compensatory dam- age, we need to prove that someone's negligent conduct caused the crash."

As Rapoport spoke in the hotel hallway, a USAir attorney brushed past and greeted him curtly. "Well that was rude," Baizer exclaimed.

Rapoport smiled. "We do get a few scowls," he said, "We're not all that popular around here."